CO129-160 - Public Offices - 1872 — Page 407

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

As Anglo-Saxon British Subjects. It is alleged at the time that they have claimed the right to inherit & acquire property; but their right to do this, as I have explained to the grand secretary Wenxiang, I have the power to dispute.

On the other hand, I have no doubt that many of them, while being as little in common with us as any thorough Chinese, do make use of their status in a way that irritates the feelings of the Chinese Authorities.

The discussion recorded in Sir R. Alcock's despatches proves this. It proves too, to my mind, how cautious we must be in examining the appeals of our Anglo-Chinese Subjects where a grievance is alleged. The Chinese Govt in 1867 insisted upon it that unless these men ceased to shave the head & wear tails, a change of costume would be necessary. The same remark has just been made here to me.

The Anglo-Chinese contended at first that to give up the tail would be the greatest inconvenience to them, would expose them to ridicule &c. But then, as the discussion proceeded, they declared themselves perfectly ready to give up the tresses & tail, and instead to grow their hair long from the temples. This was the coiffure (as they took care to observe) of the late dynasty, adopted by the Taiping rebels & by everybody of note who rebelled during their era against the Govt. Of course, no suggestion could be more unpalatable than the above.

Edit History

2026-05-20 22:18:54 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
As Anglo-Saxon British Subjects. It is alleged at the time that they have claimed the right to inherit & acquire property; but their right to do this, as I have explained to the grand secretary Wenxiang, I have the power to dispute. On the other hand, I have no doubt that many of them, while being as little in common with us as any thorough Chinese, do make use of their status in a way that irritates the feelings of the Chinese Authorities. The discussion recorded in Sir R. Alcock's despatches proves this. It proves too, to my mind, how cautious we must be in examining the appeals of our Anglo-Chinese Subjects where a grievance is alleged. The Chinese Govt in 1867 insisted upon it that unless these men ceased to shave the head & wear tails, a change of costume would be necessary. The same remark has just been made here to me. The Anglo-Chinese contended at first that to give up the tail would be the greatest inconvenience to them, would expose them to ridicule &c. But then, as the discussion proceeded, they declared themselves perfectly ready to give up the tresses & tail, and instead to grow their hair long from the temples. This was the coiffure (as they took care to observe) of the late dynasty, adopted by the Taiping rebels & by everybody of note who rebelled during their era against the Govt. Of course, no suggestion could be more unpalatable than the above.
Baseline (Original)
As Anglo-Saxon British Subjects. It is alleged at the famên that they have laid clarin tinherit & acquire property; but their right to do this, as I have Explained to the grand secretary Win. siang, Ihave the power to dispute. On the other hand, have no doubt that many of them, while as little in Come with us as asany thorough Chinese, do make use of their statues in a way that irritates the paloney of the Chiness Authorities. The discussim recorded in Sie R. Alcock's deeps, proves this. It thinking proves too, tomy cantions we must be in how Examining the affeals of our Anglo Chinese Subjects where a grief is alleged The Chinese Gott in 1867- dinsisted apons 405 upon it that unless there men ceased to share the head & wear tails, منا the of Change of costume would be bastuse. The same remark has just been made here tome. The Angtoftimes contended at first that to give up the tail would be the greatest wienremence to them, would appose them to ridicule dc. But then, as the disceration proceeded, they declared themselves, perfects ready to give up the trusure & tail, a mistead to geror де чего their hair long from the temples. This was the coffure (as they took care sobreme) It was adopted of the late dynasty. by the Taiping rebels & by everybody of rebels that made head during their era against the Gos?, toateau of Course no suggestion could be more compalatable than the above
2026-05-20 22:18:54 · Baseline
View content

As Anglo-Saxon British Subjects. It is alleged at the famên that they have laid clarin tinherit

& acquire property; but their right to do this, as I have Explained to the grand secretary Win. siang,

Ihave the power to dispute.

On the other hand, have no

doubt that many of them, while as little in Come with us as

asany thorough Chinese, do make use of their statues in a way

that irritates

the paloney of the Chiness Authorities.

The discussim recorded in Sie R. Alcock's deeps, proves this. It

thinking

proves too, tomy cantions we must be in

how

Examining

the affeals of our Anglo Chinese Subjects where a grief is alleged The Chinese Gott in 1867- dinsisted

apons

405

upon it that unless there men ceased

to share the head & wear tails,

منا

the of

Change of costume would be bastuse. The same remark has

just been made here tome. The Angtoftimes contended at first that to give up the tail would be the greatest wienremence to them, would appose

them to ridicule dc.

But then, as the disceration proceeded, they declared themselves, perfects ready to give up the trusure & tail,

a mistead to geror

де чего

their hair

long

from the temples. This was the coffure (as they took care sobreme)

It was adopted

of the late dynasty. by the Taiping rebels & by everybody of rebels that made head during their era against the Gos?, toateau of Course no suggestion could be more compalatable than the

above

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.